<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coca-cola should be more sociable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded3.com/blogs/coca-cola-should-be-more-sociable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/coca-cola-should-be-more-sociable/</link>
	<description>Digital and SEO Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/coca-cola-should-be-more-sociable/comment-page-1/#comment-8751</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2959#comment-8751</guid>
		<description>Hi MJ,

Good call. I didn&#039;t know about that campaign - it definitely looks worthwhile and straightforward, something you&#039;d think they&#039;d jump at. To my mind it is just another example of how Coke is not connecting with its customers.

Coke does have this warm and fuzzy CSR-led site - www.letsgettogether.co.uk  -but it doesnâ€™t look well used or useful.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi MJ,</p>
<p>Good call. I didn&#8217;t know about that campaign &#8211; it definitely looks worthwhile and straightforward, something you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d jump at. To my mind it is just another example of how Coke is not connecting with its customers.</p>
<p>Coke does have this warm and fuzzy CSR-led site &#8211; <a href="http://www.letsgettogether.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.letsgettogether.co.uk</a>  -but it doesnâ€™t look well used or useful.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/coca-cola-should-be-more-sociable/comment-page-1/#comment-8750</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2959#comment-8750</guid>
		<description>A whole article about Coke and social media that doesn&#039;t even mention http://www.colalife.org/ ?  Wow, that&#039;s surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A whole article about Coke and social media that doesn&#8217;t even mention <a href="http://www.colalife.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.colalife.org/</a> ?  Wow, that&#8217;s surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/coca-cola-should-be-more-sociable/comment-page-1/#comment-8749</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2959#comment-8749</guid>
		<description>â€˜A much more aggressive digital marketing presenceâ€™ doesnâ€™t sound very friendly to me. As you say, such a huge cooperation should surely be trying to concentrate on building a more sociable and engaging long-term marketing image. Itâ€™s customers donâ€™t want to feel bombarded with forceful marketing strategies, instead they want to be communicated with as real people, not just as email addresses or mobile phone numbers. Afterall, who is ever pleased when they receive a text and find out itâ€™s from some company rather than a real person? There are ways round this of course; alerting you by text when somebody has replied to your online post for example - still advertises the company, keeping it at the forefront of your mind, but in a much more subtle, less aggressive way.

Announcing that they intend to pursue a much more lively digital and social marketing presence would have certainly set them off on a better footing with their consumers. I think youâ€™re spot on when you say they seem to be completely missing a fantastic opportunity here to create a lasting community online. Interesting article, thanks Joel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€˜A much more aggressive digital marketing presenceâ€™ doesnâ€™t sound very friendly to me. As you say, such a huge cooperation should surely be trying to concentrate on building a more sociable and engaging long-term marketing image. Itâ€™s customers donâ€™t want to feel bombarded with forceful marketing strategies, instead they want to be communicated with as real people, not just as email addresses or mobile phone numbers. Afterall, who is ever pleased when they receive a text and find out itâ€™s from some company rather than a real person? There are ways round this of course; alerting you by text when somebody has replied to your online post for example &#8211; still advertises the company, keeping it at the forefront of your mind, but in a much more subtle, less aggressive way.</p>
<p>Announcing that they intend to pursue a much more lively digital and social marketing presence would have certainly set them off on a better footing with their consumers. I think youâ€™re spot on when you say they seem to be completely missing a fantastic opportunity here to create a lasting community online. Interesting article, thanks Joel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.branded3.com @ 2013-06-19 18:40:07 by W3 Total Cache -->