<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google algorithm isn&#039;t changing and hasn&#039;t gone awry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/</link>
	<description>Digital and SEO Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaltyfault</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9692</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaltyfault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9692</guid>
		<description>I think you made some good points in your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you made some good points in your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mick</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9691</link>
		<dc:creator>mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9691</guid>
		<description>Is google fast becomming unfair to keyword requests just favouring big business sites?
It seems that way now doesn&#039;t it?
It is not democratic anymore in it&#039;s results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is google fast becomming unfair to keyword requests just favouring big business sites?<br />
It seems that way now doesn&#8217;t it?<br />
It is not democratic anymore in it&#8217;s results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9690</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9690</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Paul, if your site has even a moderate amount of trust then it will rank for the main keywords of any post you make&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That must be it then. My main site&#039;s been established since 1999 and my main pages rank well.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the case of the Worms Head Sunset there are only about 100 exact phrase matches in the world and yours is the top result.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s also top for the non exact phrase. It even ranks 42nd out of 704,000 results for just &quot;Worms Head&quot;. But I agree, it&#039;s not the most common phrase in the world.

&lt;blockquote&gt;You say your pages only ranked for a short time, did you move them?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not originally, my blog was online for 7 months. However I recently removed it, choosing to concentrate on my main website instead. For some reason my normal web pages are far more popular than my blog pages were, so I&#039;ll be converting my blog content and integrating it with my main site instead. I mostly write articles rather than topical posts, so I think they&#039;re more suited to a traditional website rather than a blog.

My site&#039;s still in a mess at the moment though, I&#039;m currently redesigning the whole thing from scratch. It&#039;s going to look very different soon.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do the urls still exist in the same format as before?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not any more. The original blog pages may still be in Google&#039;s cache, but most don&#039;t exist at the moment. I&#039;ve set up redirects for the few posts I&#039;ve converted so far, but I don&#039;t want to convert any more until I get my new design finished. The current pages have the same page titles and file names, but a different path. I haven&#039;t added meta data yet either.

Thanks. Looks like a very useful site.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Paul, if your site has even a moderate amount of trust then it will rank for the main keywords of any post you make</p></blockquote>
<p>That must be it then. My main site&#8217;s been established since 1999 and my main pages rank well.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the case of the Worms Head Sunset there are only about 100 exact phrase matches in the world and yours is the top result.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s also top for the non exact phrase. It even ranks 42nd out of 704,000 results for just &#8220;Worms Head&#8221;. But I agree, it&#8217;s not the most common phrase in the world.</p>
<blockquote><p>You say your pages only ranked for a short time, did you move them?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not originally, my blog was online for 7 months. However I recently removed it, choosing to concentrate on my main website instead. For some reason my normal web pages are far more popular than my blog pages were, so I&#8217;ll be converting my blog content and integrating it with my main site instead. I mostly write articles rather than topical posts, so I think they&#8217;re more suited to a traditional website rather than a blog.</p>
<p>My site&#8217;s still in a mess at the moment though, I&#8217;m currently redesigning the whole thing from scratch. It&#8217;s going to look very different soon.</p>
<blockquote><p>Do the urls still exist in the same format as before?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not any more. The original blog pages may still be in Google&#8217;s cache, but most don&#8217;t exist at the moment. I&#8217;ve set up redirects for the few posts I&#8217;ve converted so far, but I don&#8217;t want to convert any more until I get my new design finished. The current pages have the same page titles and file names, but a different path. I haven&#8217;t added meta data yet either.</p>
<p>Thanks. Looks like a very useful site.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9689</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9689</guid>
		<description>Paul, if your site has even a moderate amount of trust then it will rank for the main keywords of any post you make as long as the keywords are not overly competitive or commercial.

In the case of the Worms Head Sunset there are only about 100 exact phrase matches in the world and yours is the top result.

You say your pages only ranked for a short time, did you move them? Do the urls still exist in the same format as before?

Welcome to Blogstorm by the way :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, if your site has even a moderate amount of trust then it will rank for the main keywords of any post you make as long as the keywords are not overly competitive or commercial.</p>
<p>In the case of the Worms Head Sunset there are only about 100 exact phrase matches in the world and yours is the top result.</p>
<p>You say your pages only ranked for a short time, did you move them? Do the urls still exist in the same format as before?</p>
<p>Welcome to Blogstorm by the way :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9688</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9688</guid>
		<description>At risk of moving this discussion from Daniel&#039;s blog, your explanation still doesn&#039;t explain the transient popularity of a number of my own blog posts on decidedly *non-hot* topics. What&#039;s so special about &quot;Welcome to the Weblog&quot; or &quot;My First Mountain&quot;?

Nothing so far as I&#039;m aware. As an experiment, I even went to extremes with incredibly mundane and not at all out of the ordinary titles such as &quot;The Rock&quot; and &quot;The Tree&quot;, although I don&#039;t recall either of those doing particularly well. However, I did make a post called &quot;The Old Oak Tree&quot; which ranked quite highly for a short while, out of millions of results.

And what&#039;s the big deal about &quot;Worms Head Sunset&quot;? Sorry to keep banging on about it, and it&#039;s probably not the most common search phrase, but I&#039;m still baffled as to why it&#039;s still ranking so highly. It&#039;s not like it&#039;s the first time the sun had ever set at Worms head, it&#039;s well known for doing that, so it&#039;s definitely not a hot topic. What&#039;s unusual about this one is that it disappeared from existence then returned to a high ranking.

Bottom line, it&#039;s not just hot topics.

So how do you explain high Google rankings for non hot topics?

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At risk of moving this discussion from Daniel&#8217;s blog, your explanation still doesn&#8217;t explain the transient popularity of a number of my own blog posts on decidedly *non-hot* topics. What&#8217;s so special about &#8220;Welcome to the Weblog&#8221; or &#8220;My First Mountain&#8221;?</p>
<p>Nothing so far as I&#8217;m aware. As an experiment, I even went to extremes with incredibly mundane and not at all out of the ordinary titles such as &#8220;The Rock&#8221; and &#8220;The Tree&#8221;, although I don&#8217;t recall either of those doing particularly well. However, I did make a post called &#8220;The Old Oak Tree&#8221; which ranked quite highly for a short while, out of millions of results.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s the big deal about &#8220;Worms Head Sunset&#8221;? Sorry to keep banging on about it, and it&#8217;s probably not the most common search phrase, but I&#8217;m still baffled as to why it&#8217;s still ranking so highly. It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s the first time the sun had ever set at Worms head, it&#8217;s well known for doing that, so it&#8217;s definitely not a hot topic. What&#8217;s unusual about this one is that it disappeared from existence then returned to a high ranking.</p>
<p>Bottom line, it&#8217;s not just hot topics.</p>
<p>So how do you explain high Google rankings for non hot topics?</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hellcola</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9687</link>
		<dc:creator>hellcola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9687</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I just wonder, does it affect PR in any way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I just wonder, does it affect PR in any way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Friends, Earn Money</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Friends, Earn Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9686</guid>
		<description>Where do you dig this information up, blogstorm gets better and better, i agree with Tom though that links from realted sites and unqiue content are the keys to PR and ultimately SERPS success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you dig this information up, blogstorm gets better and better, i agree with Tom though that links from realted sites and unqiue content are the keys to PR and ultimately SERPS success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom - The Home Business Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9685</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom - The Home Business Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9685</guid>
		<description>Links from related sites and quality information on your own site should be enough to get a good PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links from related sites and quality information on your own site should be enough to get a good PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Love - Friday 01/04/2008</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Love - Friday 01/04/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>[...] has posted an article about The Google algorithm isnâ€™t changing and hasnâ€™t gone awry, which is a reply back to TechCrunch and Mashable that Google is not changing it&#8217;s [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has posted an article about The Google algorithm isnâ€™t changing and hasnâ€™t gone awry, which is a reply back to TechCrunch and Mashable that Google is not changing it&#8217;s [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Pandey</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9683</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Pandey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/newblog/google-algorithm-isnt-changing/#comment-9683</guid>
		<description>The ranking algorithm is still based on links and authority. Any site having authority and links to it is still going to rank. This is the same reason onemansblog.com is ranking for the term &quot;buy cheap viagra&quot; even though they don&#039;t have to do anything with &quot;via#ra&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ranking algorithm is still based on links and authority. Any site having authority and links to it is still going to rank. This is the same reason onemansblog.com is ranking for the term &#8220;buy cheap viagra&#8221; even though they don&#8217;t have to do anything with &#8220;via#ra&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.branded3.com @ 2013-05-23 01:29:27 by W3 Total Cache -->