<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Organic SEO Click Through Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/</link>
	<description>Digital and SEO Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why does Google account for such a high percentage of Yelp&#039;s traffic? What might cause Google to refer less traffic to Yelp?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google accounts for a high percentage of Yelp&#039;s traffic because users are used to one search paradigm on the web and google gives them search results very fast. We know that Google is moving into the content business by creating its own content and po...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why does Google account for such a high percentage of Yelp&#8217;s traffic? What might cause Google to refer less traffic to Yelp?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google accounts for a high percentage of Yelp&#8217;s traffic because users are used to one search paradigm on the web and google gives them search results very fast. We know that Google is moving into the content business by creating its own content and po&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philadelphia SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3065</link>
		<dc:creator>Philadelphia SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got a real deal of chart analysis here and it&#039;s pretty helpful for many SEO out there worldwide, good job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a real deal of chart analysis here and it&#8217;s pretty helpful for many SEO out there worldwide, good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 03:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>It shows why most web masters aim for the top 1 in the google search engine rankings. You will have more visitors if you have higher rankings. Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shows why most web masters aim for the top 1 in the google search engine rankings. You will have more visitors if you have higher rankings. Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug N</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 02:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>Hello Patrick. You mentioned interest in a study on non-brand keywords. I did a study somewhat like that, revisiting the AOL data and breaking it out into search categories: navigational, goods and services, comparison shoppers, and so on.

The goods and services category matched pretty closely to the Chitika study:
#1 33%, #2 14%, #3 12%, #4 8%, #5 6%, #6 6%, #7 4%, #8 4%, #9 4%, #10 4%

The comparison shoppers had a bit more gradual drop-off in click-throughs:
#1 22%, #2 15%, #3 12%, #4 9%, #5 8%, #6 7%, #7 5%, #8 5%, #9 5%, #10 5%

Reference: http://dougneubauer.com/2010/10/click-through-rates-and-search-classification/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Patrick. You mentioned interest in a study on non-brand keywords. I did a study somewhat like that, revisiting the AOL data and breaking it out into search categories: navigational, goods and services, comparison shoppers, and so on.</p>
<p>The goods and services category matched pretty closely to the Chitika study:<br />
#1 33%, #2 14%, #3 12%, #4 8%, #5 6%, #6 6%, #7 4%, #8 4%, #9 4%, #10 4%</p>
<p>The comparison shoppers had a bit more gradual drop-off in click-throughs:<br />
#1 22%, #2 15%, #3 12%, #4 9%, #5 8%, #6 7%, #7 5%, #8 5%, #9 5%, #10 5%</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="http://dougneubauer.com/2010/10/click-through-rates-and-search-classification/" rel="nofollow">http://dougneubauer.com/2010/10/click-through-rates-and-search-classification/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Arnold you can find CTR data by brand, location type searches here: http://www.seomad.com/SEOBlog/google-seo-organic-ctr-segmented-by-brand-product-and-location.html hope you find it useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnold you can find CTR data by brand, location type searches here: <a href="http://www.seomad.com/SEOBlog/google-seo-organic-ctr-segmented-by-brand-product-and-location.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomad.com/SEOBlog/google-seo-organic-ctr-segmented-by-brand-product-and-location.html</a> hope you find it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>Nice work Patrick. I&#039;ve seen quite a few studies around this for now and as you do I would really like to see a more detailed study, breaking down keyword types by brand / product name and non-brand / generic keywords, and even better a breakdown by industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Patrick. I&#8217;ve seen quite a few studies around this for now and as you do I would really like to see a more detailed study, breaking down keyword types by brand / product name and non-brand / generic keywords, and even better a breakdown by industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fashionappliance.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>fashionappliance.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3059</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3059</guid>
		<description>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Shouldn’t Disregard SEO &#124; Epouster</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Shouldn’t Disregard SEO &#124; Epouster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO &#124; Epouster</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/google-organic-seo-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Disregard SEO &#124; Epouster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3691#comment-3057</guid>
		<description>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is generally agreed in the industry that ranking first on a search will get you somewhere between 35-45% of people looking for that keyword. This number is usually half for 2nd place and continues to drop [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.branded3.com @ 2013-06-20 10:24:42 by W3 Total Cache -->