<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/</link>
	<description>Digital and SEO Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7478</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7478</guid>
		<description>Is this still valid, I can&#039;t seem to get google to follow my javascript links in the same document, been 8 weeks, pages have &quot;follow&quot; just not indexing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this still valid, I can&#8217;t seem to get google to follow my javascript links in the same document, been 8 weeks, pages have &#8220;follow&#8221; just not indexing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Clone</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Clone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7477</guid>
		<description>Google constantly changes things up to keep webmasters on their toes. While they might have made that change 2 years ago, who knows what rules have they secretly implemented nowadays. With ever changing scripts and algorithms, we should always rely on the fundamentals for SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google constantly changes things up to keep webmasters on their toes. While they might have made that change 2 years ago, who knows what rules have they secretly implemented nowadays. With ever changing scripts and algorithms, we should always rely on the fundamentals for SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7476</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7476</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick,

What about links created in the html using document.write from an external javascript? Does Google pass pagerank through these?

(The HTML and links are visible in FireFox&#039;s source code. But not in safari&#039;s source--it just shows the link to the actual JS file there.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick,</p>
<p>What about links created in the html using document.write from an external javascript? Does Google pass pagerank through these?</p>
<p>(The HTML and links are visible in FireFox&#8217;s source code. But not in safari&#8217;s source&#8211;it just shows the link to the actual JS file there.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sessel</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7475</link>
		<dc:creator>Sessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7475</guid>
		<description>After we had a change from PR 0 to 2 on our project tus-hasede.blogspot.com on October 23rd there has nothing happened with our other websites. I guess that the pagerank will not be discontinued but maybe there will be just updates of single websites in the future and no &quot;big update&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After we had a change from PR 0 to 2 on our project tus-hasede.blogspot.com on October 23rd there has nothing happened with our other websites. I guess that the pagerank will not be discontinued but maybe there will be just updates of single websites in the future and no &#8220;big update&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7472</link>
		<dc:creator>aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7472</guid>
		<description>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7473</link>
		<dc:creator>aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7473</guid>
		<description>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7474</link>
		<dc:creator>aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7474</guid>
		<description>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JavaScript Links Now Passing PageRank &amp; Anchor Text, BlogStorm [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7471</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7471</guid>
		<description>Do javascript internal link menus count as much as internal html links?  I have a js menu that users can click to get to their state as the html links take up too much space, but since I switched to the js menu I have noticed that my ranking for each state has gone down.
So for the next week I am going to back to the plain old html links to see if I get a pop.  The only issue is that I have completed many other on page SEO implementations so I won&#039;t know for certain the answer to this question.
Please let me know what the consensus on this is.
thanks ahead of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do javascript internal link menus count as much as internal html links?  I have a js menu that users can click to get to their state as the html links take up too much space, but since I switched to the js menu I have noticed that my ranking for each state has gone down.<br />
So for the next week I am going to back to the plain old html links to see if I get a pop.  The only issue is that I have completed many other on page SEO implementations so I won&#8217;t know for certain the answer to this question.<br />
Please let me know what the consensus on this is.<br />
thanks ahead of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7470</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7470</guid>
		<description>One of our programmers predicted this almost 8 months before this post or so. Very interesting. My opinion is that Google will someday index all forms of code and rank it according to how the browser renders the final version of the content. Its just a matter of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our programmers predicted this almost 8 months before this post or so. Very interesting. My opinion is that Google will someday index all forms of code and rank it according to how the browser renders the final version of the content. Its just a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Develop an SEO Link Building Strategy That Delivers the Goods (Link Value) &#124; Wizpress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/javascript-links-now-passing-pagerank-anchor-text/comment-page-1/#comment-7469</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Develop an SEO Link Building Strategy That Delivers the Goods (Link Value) &#124; Wizpress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=2480#comment-7469</guid>
		<description>[...] a href=&#8221;http://www.site.com&#8221; &gt;, it&#8217;s fair game. Google has also started to count Javascript links, but HTML is still the ideal. We&#8217;ll get more into Javascript [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a href=&#8221;<a href="http://www.site.com&#038;#8221" rel="nofollow">http://www.site.com&#038;#8221</a>; &gt;, it&#8217;s fair game. Google has also started to count Javascript links, but HTML is still the ideal. We&#8217;ll get more into Javascript [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.branded3.com @ 2013-05-23 00:10:20 by W3 Total Cache -->