<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spyware &amp; Click Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/</link>
	<description>Digital and SEO Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typos may earn Google $500m a year (Jim Giles/New Scientist) &#171; Techno Pond</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Typos may earn Google $500m a year (Jim Giles/New Scientist) &#171; Techno Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>[...] Spyware &amp; Click Fraud (blogstorm.co.uk) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spyware &amp; Click Fraud (blogstorm.co.uk) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Very interesting; I&#039;m glad you pointed this out. I&#039;ve long been suspicious of Adwords and other PPC services in terms of the accuracy of their results - this just makes things even more unreliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting; I&#8217;m glad you pointed this out. I&#8217;ve long been suspicious of Adwords and other PPC services in terms of the accuracy of their results &#8211; this just makes things even more unreliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting development regarding pay per click advertisements, and one that has very serious implications for both Google and the clients paying. The constant evolution of spyware is obviously something that is well documented, with most PC users taking steps to protect their computer and avoid any kind of security issue. 

However the fact that this spyware is targeting websites creates a huge problem, in that it just takes a few users who have little or inadequate system protection, and a PPC advert is compromised. 

I will be interested to see how Google tackle this issue, and what can be done to prevent something that seems a difficult issue to fix. It will be interesting to see if Google covers this issue publicly, as it will obviously have major implications on those users looking to purchase a PPC campaign if they know the clicks received are not genuine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting development regarding pay per click advertisements, and one that has very serious implications for both Google and the clients paying. The constant evolution of spyware is obviously something that is well documented, with most PC users taking steps to protect their computer and avoid any kind of security issue. </p>
<p>However the fact that this spyware is targeting websites creates a huge problem, in that it just takes a few users who have little or inadequate system protection, and a PPC advert is compromised. </p>
<p>I will be interested to see how Google tackle this issue, and what can be done to prevent something that seems a difficult issue to fix. It will be interesting to see if Google covers this issue publicly, as it will obviously have major implications on those users looking to purchase a PPC campaign if they know the clicks received are not genuine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chirlemann</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>chirlemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply Patrick. 

Yes, my mistake I get it now. I had confused Adsense with Adwords! 

Another question that comes to mind, where does the &#039;fake click&#039; come from? Is this generated from within the consumers computer or offsite? 

What I am trying to get at is if the click is generated by one IP but the session on the merchants website another this could be a clue to this kind of fraud.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Patrick. </p>
<p>Yes, my mistake I get it now. I had confused Adsense with Adwords! </p>
<p>Another question that comes to mind, where does the &#8216;fake click&#8217; come from? Is this generated from within the consumers computer or offsite? </p>
<p>What I am trying to get at is if the click is generated by one IP but the session on the merchants website another this could be a clue to this kind of fraud.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>The winner is the person whose Adsense account is the one serving the click - they are also the same people who spread the spyware in the first place which fakes the click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The winner is the person whose Adsense account is the one serving the click &#8211; they are also the same people who spread the spyware in the first place which fakes the click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chirlemann</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>chirlemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick, 

Really interesting article (I like the blogstorm emails because they are short enough to actually read! in a few minutes).

One thing I am still a little unclear on though is who makes money. The only winner here is Google. That is to say, I have a few adsense campaigns, if i knew that a particular person was likely to book through our business I would be crazy to force them to follow a link using spyware when they would have arrived on a free channel... I would serve them a display ad... or send an email... even a direct mailing response. 

I mean unless it is an avertising agency trying to make themselves look good.. or content networks trying to increase clicks (and commission from the ads) I do not see how how the scammer makes money.

Anyway, if you could shed some more light on this aspect that would be much appreciated. 

Kind regards

chirlemann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick, </p>
<p>Really interesting article (I like the blogstorm emails because they are short enough to actually read! in a few minutes).</p>
<p>One thing I am still a little unclear on though is who makes money. The only winner here is Google. That is to say, I have a few adsense campaigns, if i knew that a particular person was likely to book through our business I would be crazy to force them to follow a link using spyware when they would have arrived on a free channel&#8230; I would serve them a display ad&#8230; or send an email&#8230; even a direct mailing response. </p>
<p>I mean unless it is an avertising agency trying to make themselves look good.. or content networks trying to increase clicks (and commission from the ads) I do not see how how the scammer makes money.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you could shed some more light on this aspect that would be much appreciated. </p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
<p>chirlemann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Altoft</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1818</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Altoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1818</guid>
		<description>The guys running the Adsense ads which the fake clicks are clicking on I assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys running the Adsense ads which the fake clicks are clicking on I assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>Patrick, where&#039;s the money in this? Who&#039;s making it and how? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, where&#8217;s the money in this? Who&#8217;s making it and how? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rifki</title>
		<link>http://www.branded3.com/blogs/spyware-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rifki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/?p=3433#comment-1816</guid>
		<description>An interesting article.
This just shows how sophisticated the fraudsters methods have now become, and how vulnerable we all are. Google should act quickly to deal with this, and assure users of PPC that they will not suffer from this kind of fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article.<br />
This just shows how sophisticated the fraudsters methods have now become, and how vulnerable we all are. Google should act quickly to deal with this, and assure users of PPC that they will not suffer from this kind of fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.branded3.com @ 2013-05-22 22:05:59 by W3 Total Cache -->