Study reveals the mainstream media should link out more
A study carried out this week by Dave Eaves reveals that mainstream media outlets actually benefit by linking out to their sources.
The study, which takes into account incoming and outgoing links, uses statistical calculations (the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient) to show that there is a strong correlation (0.842733801) between the number of times a site links out compared to the number of links it gets back in return.
In addition the study shows how strong the domains of these mainstream media sources are using the new SEOmoz Trifecta tool.
Most mainstream media sites are quite good at linking out from blogs although some still link less from their main stories and are not always known for crediting their sources.
James Montgomery, Editor of FT.com, points out that:
one needs a clear distinction between â€œattributionâ€ and â€œsourcingâ€, journalistically speaking. Citing a non-FT source would not, generally speaking, meet the FTâ€™s required standards of verification. (Just because something is reported by the New York Times, say, doesnâ€™t make it true, however much we implicitly believe what we read in that newspaper – we have to check for ourselves.)
Just because a blogger writes something before another site doesn’t mean they are the source. A mainstream news site like the FT.com has to publish accurate news – citing a blogger as a source isn’t usually reliable enough.
Latest from B3Labs
- Another milestone reached for Branded3 as it’s acquired by the
St Ives Group
- The latest media consumer findings & what they mean for digital marketers
- Talk to Branded3 at @BuyYorkshire in Leeds next week!
Latest from Blogstorm
- 5 myths about manual penalty recovery
- Google gets more aggressive with link devaluation
- Why your press releases are getting you penalised