Update on Interflora vs Marks & Spencer AdWords trademark row
Everybody is keeping a close eye on the Interflora vs Marks & Spencer case which we first covered back in December. Unlike a lot of other similar cases this one will probably go the distance simply because of the brands involved.
If this case goes the distance the implications for brand bidding could be quite significant.
The High Court in London has decided that the law is not settled on whether brand bidding on a competitorâ€™s brand is lawful and has referred certain questions to the European Court of Justice for determination. This clearly goes against Marks and Spencerâ€™s position that the practice is â€œnot unlawfulâ€. The High Court has denied Marks & Spencer permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal in respect of the nature of the questions referred to the European Court of Justice.
In his judgement, Mr Justice Arnold commented that Googleâ€™s decision to operate a different policy in the UK and Ireland to that in the rest of Europe is â€œfairly remarkable given that the relevant law is, or should be, essentially the same throughout Europe.â€
Latest from B3Labs
- Another milestone reached for Branded3 as it’s acquired by the
St Ives Group
- The latest media consumer findings & what they mean for digital marketers
- Talk to Branded3 at @BuyYorkshire in Leeds next week!
Latest from Blogstorm
- Early thoughts on Penguin 2.0
- 5 myths about manual penalty recovery
- Google gets more aggressive with link devaluation