As a Data Analyst with my own blog; naturally, I’m always intrigued to check out some of the keywords that bring people to my site.
Focusing on video games, my blog attracts some pretty random keywords, take a look at this one I found the other day:
So, I decided to check it out for myself. By using the Google image tracking filter AJ Kohn wrote about, I was able to tell this came from image search. So before long, I was searching for photos of ‘pretty emo boys’ to see what image was ranking.
The picture is of Squall, the main character from Final Fantasy VIII. It seems unsurprising, because I wrote a review of Final Fantasy VIII some time ago.
However, this picture doesn’t appear anywhere in the review. But in this paragraph I do in fact link out to that picture.
The link is to this image of said ’emo’ pretty boy, which is not hosted on my blog.
So, why am I ranking in image search for an image I don’t even host?
Of course, Patrick Altoft comes up with the answer in about a second after seeing the question.
You don’t need to have the image on your page, a link to the image is enough for Google to think the image is there.
In fact, he wrote a post about this… back in 2007!.
So now you have it, nearly six years on, and Google still has no idea how to credit images to the right people.
I know this is a lame problem to have in the grand scheme of online marketing, but it’s not exactly clever on Google’s part. My blog receiving the traffic means that the original owners of the image are not getting the traffic. Not only that, but if a user clicks through to my site, they’ll see that the image isn’t there, and think “what am I do on this page?” and bounce right back.
If anyone else has seen this, I’d like to hear about it. I’m on Twitter @ejbarnes89 or you can leave a comment in the section below.