I’m not going to pretend this post is anything more than a list of statistics. Statistics on voice search that you can read and refer to in order to understand how optimising sites for users will change in 2017 as usage of voice search increase.
2017 sees the launch of Home – Google’s voice-activated speaker powered by the Google Assistant and also the integration of Google Assistant into our TVs. December 2016 saw Amazon’s Echo products become their most popular product over the holiday period.
“50% of all searches will be voice searches by 2020” according to comscore
“About 30% of searches will be done without a screen by 2020.” via Mediapos
“We estimate there will be 21.4 million smart speakers in the US by 2020” according to Activate
“Google voice search queries in 2016 are up 35x over 2008” according to Google trends via Search Engine Watch
“40% of adults now use voice search once per day” according to Location World
“Cortana now has 133 million monthly users” according to Microsoft/Tech Radar
“In May 2016, 1 in 5 searches on an Android app in the USA were through speech” according to KPCB
“25% of 16-24s use voice search on mobile” via Global Web Index
“41% of people using voice search have only started in the last 6 months” according to MindMeld
“60% of people using voice search have started in the last year” according to MindMeld
“11% of people using voice search started more than 3 years ago” according to MindMeld
19% of people use Siri at least daily. (HubSpot, 2015) (Source: https://www.hubspot.com/marketing-statistics)
“9% of users said that they’ve used AI personal assistants like Siri or Cortana in the past day” according to AYTM
“45% of those who have used AI personal assistants said they’ve used Siri. 33% have used Google Now. 27% used Microsoft’s Cortana. 10% have used Amazon Echo or Alexa.” via AYTM
“1 in 5 online adults have used voice search on their mobile in the last month” via Global Web Index
“37% use Siri, 23% use Microsoft’s Cortana AI, and 19% use Amazon’s Alexa AI at least monthly.” (HubSpot, 2015) (Source: https://www.hubspot.com/marketing-statistics)
“Amazon sold approximately 2 million units in the first nine months of 2016” according to CIRP
“Amazon sold 4.4 million Echo units in its first full year of sales” according to Geek Wire
“25% of searches on Windows 10 taskbar are voice. On desktop!” according to Purna Virji
“Only 11% of respondents who already own an Amazon Alexa or Google Home device will also buy a competing device.” via Voicelabs.
“Application growth for Amazon Alexa has been impressive – over 500% in the second half of 2016″ according to Voicelabs.
“Evercore estimates 500,000 Google Home units shipped in 2016” via Bloomberg
“Mobile voice-related searches are 3X more likely to be local-based than text” via Search Engine Watch
“Home Alone and Elf were the most requested 2016 holiday movies with Alexa.” via Amazon
“Customers use Amazon Echo for many purposes, with one-third using it as an information provider responding to questions and over 40% as an audio speaker for listening to streaming music.” according to CIRP.
“Nearly 50% of people are now using voice search when researching products.” via Social Media Today
“Google’s AI has been reading nearly 3,000 romance novels in order to improve its conversational search abilities” via Click Hub
“Humans can speak 150 words per minute vs type 40 words per minute” via Katherine Watier
“28% think voice search is a more accurate way of searching” via Katherine Watier
“43% cite that using voice search is quicker than using a website or an app” via Katherine Watier
“42% say that use while driving is a reason for using voice search” Katherine Watier
“outside 35% of normal recognition errors, 31% were noise related and 22% were pronunciation related” according to Research Gate
“Today, speech recognition word error rate is 8 percent.” via Bruce Clay
“Fifteen years ago quality had stalled, with word-error rates of 20-30%. Microsoft’s latest system, which has six neural networks running in parallel, has reached 5.9% (see chart), the same as a human transcriber’s.” via The Economist